Ambiguity and vagueness in party competition
نویسندگان
چکیده
A central theme emerging from recent research on party competition is that political actors sometimes remain deliberately opaque in their communication. This phenomenon has been investigated under labels such as position-blurring, ambiguity, issue clarity or ideological clarity. In this paper we propose a distinction between two concepts are conflated literature: ambiguity and vagueness. While means there substantial variance parties' positional signals, vagueness denotes statements non-committal terms of the policy action to be taken outcome achieved. We explore co-variation these dimensions relationship ownership government status using manifesto data produced by Austrian National Election Study. These unique they provide detailed information well commitment (election pledges). show uncorrelated have opposite relationships with (vagueness positive, negative). conclude analyses position-blurring should take different strategies non-clarity communication into account.
منابع مشابه
Vagueness, Ambiguity and Perceptual Bistability
1. Introduction. While vagueness and ambiguity have been opposed in the semantic domain (vagueness is often described as meaning underdetermination, ambiguity as meaning overdetermi-nation, see Fine 1975; moreover, vagueness is fundamentally a property of concepts, ambiguity a property of stimuli or expressions), Raffman has made the suggestion that within soritical series, borderline cases typ...
متن کاملA Mixture Approach to Vagueness and Ambiguity
When asked to indicate which items from a set of candidates belong to a particular natural language category inter-individual differences occur: Individuals disagree which items should be considered category members. The premise of this paper is that these inter-individual differences in semantic categorization reflect both ambiguity and vagueness. Categorization differences are said to be due ...
متن کاملself-revision and third party revision in translation
اهمیت این پژوهش در آن بود که به گفت? بسیاری از پژوهشگرانِ حوز? بازبینی ترجمه، ادبیات موجود در این زمینه به لحاظ نظری و عملی چندان قوی نیست و بخش های موجود نیز برداشت مناسبی از این مرحل? فرایند ترجمه ندارند، اگرچه اخیراً توجه به آن به صورت نظام مند افزایش یافته است. در عین حال، پژوهش های موجود از یک سو بر دگربازبینی بیشتر از خودبازبینی تأکید دارند و از دیگر سو تنها به لحاظ نظری به این موضوع می پرد...
15 صفحه اولVagueness and Referential Ambiguity in a Large-scale Annotated Corpus∗
In this paper, we argue that difficulties in the definition of coreference itself contribute to lower inter-annotator agreement in certain cases. Data from a large referentially annotated corpus serves to corroborate this point, using a quantitative investigation to assess which effects or problems are likely to be the most prominent. Several examples where such problems occur are discussed in ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Party Politics
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1354-0688', '1460-3683']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231195272